COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT vs HIGH LAND DYE WORKS P. LTD. . — C.A. No. 2598 - 2603/2001
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010185452000
Filing Date
02-Nov-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 2598 - 2603/2001
Diary Number
18545/2000
Order Date
18-Apr-2006
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT
Adv. P. PARMESWARAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIGH LAND DYE WORKS P. LTD. .
Adv. V. BALACHANDRAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2598 - 2603/2001
Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the Commissioner of Central Excise's statutory appeals against High Land Dye Works P. Ltd., affirming the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision that found no suppression of facts by the respondents and therefore ruled the department was not entitled to invoke the extended period of limitation for recovering differential excise duty of Rs. 74,61,625/-. The Court held the Tribunal's factual finding required no interference and ordered each party to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts