UNION OF INDIA vs RAMESH CHAND — SLP(C) No. 17116/2013
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010182872011
Filing Date
13-Jun-2011
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 17116/2013
Diary Number
18287/2011
Order Date
29-Apr-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESH CHAND
Adv. SAHARYA & CO. AVIJIT BHATTACHARJEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
26-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 17116/2013
Case Summary: Union of India v. Ramesh Chand Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all Special Leave Petitions filed by the Union of India as barred by time. The Court rejected the applications for condonation of delay (ranging from 3,705 to 3,771 days), finding the reasons for delay wholly unsatisfactory and lacking valid justification under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court clarified that the impugned judgments shall not be treated as precedents for other cases. Background: The petitions challenged Delhi High Court judgments (dated December 7, 2000, and January 4, 2001) that allowed respondents' appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, awarding land compensation at Rs. 345 per square yard with statutory benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts