K.K.KOTIA . vs M/S KODAK INDIA P.LTD.. — Crl.A. No. 1218/2010

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010180362009

Filing Date

23-Jun-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1218/2010

Diary Number

18036/2009

Order Date

27-May-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.K.KOTIA .

    Adv. N. ANNAPOORANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S KODAK INDIA P.LTD..

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1218/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 001218/2010 (K.K. Kotia v. M/S Kodak India P. Ltd.) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging the High Court's reversal of their discharge in a criminal case involving embezzlement charges (FIR No. 143/95). The appellants had contested Delhi's territorial jurisdiction, arguing the agreement was executed in Mumbai; however, the High Court upheld Delhi's jurisdiction under Section 181(4) of the CrPC and Clause 21 of the 1993 agreement. The Court affirmed the High Court's finding as valid in law, though it permitted appellants to bring additional facts (including Appellant 1's death and Appellant 2's non-involvement) before the trial court for appropriate consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case