M/S RANJIT SINGH & CO. vs M/S ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CO.LD. — C.A. No. 2020/2014

Case under Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010180222011

Filing Date

08-Jun-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 2020/2014

Diary Number

18022/2011

Order Date

07-Feb-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RANJIT SINGH & CO.

    Adv. RAJINDER MATHUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CO.LD.

    Adv. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 31-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-Jun-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2020/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ranjit Singh & Co. v. Orissa Power Transmission Co. Ltd. Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's May 6, 2011 judgment. The Court ruled the High Court lacked jurisdiction to disqualify an arbitrator who was properly appointed under the contract's arbitration clause. The Court held that challenges to arbitrator jurisdiction must be raised before the arbitral tribunal under Section 16(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, not through High Court intervention under Section 11(6). Key Issue: After disputes arose in 2008, the parties proceeded to arbitration with three arbitrators appointed per contract terms. Respondent challenged the third arbitrator's appointment before the High Court, which initially rejected the petition but later accepted a review petition, directing the third arbitrator be excluded from hearing jurisdiction challenges. The Supreme Court found this exceeded judicial authority and violated statutory procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case