M/S RANJIT SINGH & CO. vs M/S ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CO.LD. — C.A. No. 2020/2014
Case under Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010180222011
Filing Date
08-Jun-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 2020/2014
Diary Number
18022/2011
Order Date
07-Feb-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S RANJIT SINGH & CO.
Adv. RAJINDER MATHUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CO.LD.
Adv. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2020/2014
Case Summary: Ranjit Singh & Co. v. Orissa Power Transmission Co. Ltd. Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's May 6, 2011 judgment. The Court ruled the High Court lacked jurisdiction to disqualify an arbitrator who was properly appointed under the contract's arbitration clause. The Court held that challenges to arbitrator jurisdiction must be raised before the arbitral tribunal under Section 16(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, not through High Court intervention under Section 11(6). Key Issue: After disputes arose in 2008, the parties proceeded to arbitration with three arbitrators appointed per contract terms. Respondent challenged the third arbitrator's appointment before the High Court, which initially rejected the petition but later accepted a review petition, directing the third arbitrator be excluded from hearing jurisdiction challenges. The Supreme Court found this exceeded judicial authority and violated statutory procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts