RANGANATH vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER RAICHUR — C.A. No. 6244/2013

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010178992011

Filing Date

07-Jun-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 6244/2013

Diary Number

17899/2011

Order Date

02-Aug-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANGANATH

    Adv. GAUTAM NARAYAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER RAICHUR

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-Aug-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta

  4. 20-Jul-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta

  5. 12-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Apr-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar

  7. 23-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Aug-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Jun-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6244/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Ranganath v. The Assistant Commissioner, The Land Acquisition Officer Raichur (C.A. No. 6244/2013) Ranganath's appeal challenging land acquisition compensation was dismissed by the Supreme Court on August 2, 2023. The Court found that the High Court's enhancement of compensation to Rs. 1,00,000 per acre (for 26 acres acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894) constituted just and fair compensation after considering all aspects, and found no grounds for interference. All pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case