JHARKHAND RAJYA V.B.A.P.K.S.SAMITTEE vs SAHODAR PRASAD MAHTO . — SLP(C) No. 14773/2009

Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010171592009

Filing Date

05-Jun-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 14773/2009

Diary Number

17159/2009

Order Date

04-Feb-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JHARKHAND RAJYA V.B.A.P.K.S.SAMITTEE

    Adv. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHODAR PRASAD MAHTO .

    Adv. KRISHNANAND PANDEYA HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 31-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 24-Aug-2012
  7. 13-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Apr-2011
  9. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Aug-2010
  15. 19-Feb-2010
  16. 19-Feb-2010
  17. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 15-Jan-2010
  19. 14-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 10-Aug-2009
  21. 15-Jun-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 05-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 14773/2009

  23. 27-Jan-2009
  24. 11-Dec-2008
  25. 21-Nov-2008
  26. 04-Nov-2008
  27. 22-Sep-2008
  28. 25-Jul-2008
  29. 30-May-2008
  30. 15-May-2008
  31. 06-May-2008
  32. 26-Mar-2008
  33. 12-Dec-2007
  34. 24-Sep-2007
  35. 17-Sep-2007
  36. 07-Sep-2007
  37. 07-Sep-2007
casestatus.in Summary

On 04/02/2013, the Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petitions filed by Jharkhand Rajya V.B.A.P.K.S. Samittee challenging a High Court order. The State of Jharkhand and Jharkhand State Electricity Board agreed to implement the High Court's order in accordance with Sections 131-134 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the petitioner accepted this course of action. The Court noted that the petitioner remained free to challenge any ultimate decision that deviated from these statutory provisions before the appropriate forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case