RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. vs AZAD MOHAMMAD — C.A. No. 86/2014

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010155542010

Filing Date

11-May-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 86/2014

Diary Number

15554/2010

Order Date

03-Jan-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP.

    Adv. S. K. BHATTACHARYA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AZAD MOHAMMAD

    Adv. RANA RANJIT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 17-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 12-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 17-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 11-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 86/2014

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Supreme Court allowed Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation's appeal on January 3, 2014, holding that civil courts lack power to order reinstatement—an issue already settled by the precedent in R.S.R.T.C. v. Deen Dayal Sharma. The Court set aside the judgments of the lower courts and permitted respondent Azad Mohammad to pursue his remedy through the appropriate forum if he wished, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case