GIAN CHAND . vs STATE OF HARYANA . — C.A. No. 6668 - 6669/2013
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010132512011
Filing Date
21-Apr-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 6668 - 6669/2013
Diary Number
13251/2011
Order Date
07-Aug-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIAN CHAND .
Adv. SHIVA PUJAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. NARESH BAKSHI SUBHASISH BHOWMICK ANUBHA AGRAWAL MOHAN LAL SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
13-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6668 - 6669/2013
Case Summary: Gian Chand v. State of Haryana (C.A. No. 006668-006669/2013) The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and quashed the land acquisition of 483 acres in Pinjore, Haryana for residential sector development. The Court found that the Land Acquisition Collector failed to comply with mandatory Section 5A(2) procedures by mechanically signing pre-filled recommendations without objectively considering landowners' objections. The State Government must follow proper acquisition procedures if it wishes to re-acquire the land, and appellants remain free to raise all objections in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts