K.VISHWANATHAN AND ORS. vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. — C.A. No. 3149/2009
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010121202008
Filing Date
25-Apr-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 3149/2009
Diary Number
12120/2008
Order Date
12-Apr-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.VISHWANATHAN AND ORS.
Adv. G. BALAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS.
Adv. RANI CHHABRA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA ANU GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
11-Apr-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
05-Apr-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
04-Apr-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
15-Mar-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
14-Mar-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
08-Mar-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
07-Mar-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
31-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2018
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
24-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
07-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jun-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3149/2009
Summary of C.A. No. 003149/2009 (K. Vishwanathan & Ors. v. Government of India & Ors.) The Supreme Court disposed of the civil appeal on April 12, 2018, granting a nuanced relief. Ten private respondents who had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench (all retired by 2011) were entitled to monetary and consequential benefits under the Madras High Court judgment within 12 weeks. However, the appellants themselves were not disturbed despite the High Court judgment, as they had worked in their positions for over 20 years and similar employee decisions had attained finality. The contempt petitions were also disposed of accordingly, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts