RAHUL GUPTA vs THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — SLP(C) No. 16385 - 16388/2012

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010114722012

Filing Date

02-Apr-2012

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 16385 - 16388/2012

Diary Number

11472/2012

Order Date

28-Sep-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL GUPTA

    Adv. GARIMA BAJAJ[P-8] GARIMA BAJAJ[P-7] GARIMA BAJAJ[P-6] GARIMA BAJAJ[P-5] GARIMA BAJAJ[P-4] GARIMA BAJAJ[P-3] ASWATHI M.K.[P-2] PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-6] VIKAS UPADHYAY[R-5] ALOK GUPTA[R-4] PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-3] BINU TAMTA[R-1] MANIKA TRIPATHY[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 20-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 20-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 20-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Aug-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 28-Jan-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 28-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 07-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 07-Jan-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 05-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 05-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 20-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 20-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 14-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 14-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 10-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 10-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 09-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 09-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 13-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 13-Jan-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 18-Nov-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 31-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 31-Oct-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 31-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 27-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 08-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 29-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 29-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 25-Jul-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 01-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 14-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 23-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 05-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 01-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 27-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 16-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 02-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 16385 - 16388/2012

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

On 28-09-2018, the Supreme Court (Justices S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao) heard the mention of Contempt Petitions Nos.764-767/2016 filed in connection with SLP(C) Nos.16385-16388/2012 between Rahul Gupta and Arun Goel (IAS), Vice Chairman DDA. The Court ordered that the case "Not to be deleted from the notified date," effectively maintaining the case on the active roster. The respondent's counsel was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case