U.T. ADMINISTRATION vs B.K. KHANNA . — C.A. No. 2845/2001
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010113482000
Filing Date
13-Jul-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 2845/2001
Diary Number
11348/2000
Order Date
09-Apr-2001
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.U.T. ADMINISTRATION
Adv. NARESH BAKSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.B.K. KHANNA .
Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR SHARMA INDRA SAWHNEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2845/2001
Case Summary: U.T. Administration v. B.K. Khanna The Supreme Court heard the U.T. Administration's appeal challenging a High Court order requiring payment of medical reimbursement (Rs. 84,393) to a retired High Court employee for bypass surgery costs. While the Court recognized the Administration's technical defense based on retrospective 1992 employment rules, it disposed of the appeal without deciding the liability question, instead directing Punjab's Chief Secretary to review fund allocation procedures within six weeks. The appeal was disposed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts