THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ETC. AND ETC. STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) vs R. THIAGARAJAN AND ORS. ETC. — C.A. No. 10030 - 10189/2017

Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010106462014

DISPOSED

Filing Date

29-03-2014 11:22 AM

Registration No

C.A. No. 10030 - 10189/2017

Diary Number

10646/2014

Order Date

28-11-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ETC. AND ETC. STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)

Respondent(s)

R. THIAGARAJAN AND ORS. ETC.

Orders in this case

[ 2019 INSC 1293 ] Judgement - of Main Case
08-05-2017 ROP
08-05-2017 ROP
08-05-2017 Office Report
08-05-2017 ROP
03-05-2017 ROP
03-05-2017 Office Report
03-05-2017 ROP
06-04-2017 ROP
06-04-2017 Office Report
06-04-2017 ROP
03-10-2016 ROP
03-10-2016 Office Report
03-10-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 Office Report
05-09-2016 Office Report
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
05-09-2016 ROP
17-08-2016 Office Report
18-02-2016 ROP
18-02-2016 ROP
09-12-2015 ROP
09-12-2015 Office Report
09-12-2015 ROP
01-12-2015 ROP
01-12-2015 ROP
16-03-2015 ROP
16-03-2015 Office Report
16-03-2015 Office Report
16-03-2015 ROP
08-12-2014 ROP
08-12-2014 ROP

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 10029/2017

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case C.A. No. 010030-010189/2017 The Supreme Court of India upheld the High Court's decision to constitute a fresh Pay Grievance Redressal Committee (PGRC) with retired Judge D. Murugesan as chairman to reconsider pay-scale anomalies in Tamil Nadu government posts, rejecting both the government's attempt to reverse prior pay benefits without notice and the employees' plea for complete reversal. The Court ruled that while the government can rectify pay anomalies, it must follow due process with adequate notice and hearing, clarifying that any reduction in pay scales would be prospective only and previously paid amounts would not be recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case