KASHMIR SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 1796/2012

Case under 1511Ttf-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Sentence of 2 Years to 5 Years Is Imposed.) Section II-C. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010095922012

Filing Date

20-Mar-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1796/2012

Diary Number

9592/2012

Order Date

13-May-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1511TTF-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Cases where sentence of 2 years to 5 years is imposed.) Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KASHMIR SINGH

    Adv. RAUF RAHIM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-2] [Pr] HARISH PANDEY[P-1] [Pr] NIRMAL CHOPRA[P-2]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. BHARAT THAKORLAL MANUBARWALA[R-1] [Gr]

Case History

  1. 13-May-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 13-May-2025

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  3. 31-Jan-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 31-Jan-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  5. 19-Dec-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Dec-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar

  7. 26-Sep-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 29-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 20-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1796/2012

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001796/2012 On 13-05-2025, the Supreme Court heard Kashmir Singh & another's criminal appeal against the State of Himachal Pradesh. The court found that appellant No. 2 failed to appear with legal representation. Justice Sandeep Mehta directed the Supreme Court Legal Service Committee to appoint a legal aid counsel to represent appellant No. 2 in the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case