DIR./APPOINTING AUTHY.G.B.P.SPL.S.I. vs R.K. SINGH — C.A. No. 1288/2002

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010092212001

Filing Date

29-May-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 1288/2002

Diary Number

9221/2001

Order Date

07-Jan-2002

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIR./APPOINTING AUTHY.G.B.P.SPL.S.I.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.K. SINGH

    Adv. HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Sep-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-May-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1288/2002

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this 2002 Supreme Court hearing, the central issue was whether an Inquiring Officer must notify a delinquent employee of further inquiry proceedings after the delinquent has been set ex parte (proceeded against in absence). The petitioner's counsel argued there is no such obligation once ex parte proceedings are initiated, undertaking to support this with legal authorities. The Court adjourned the matter for four weeks to allow arguments on this procedural question in disciplinary inquiries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case