STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs M/S. NAV BHARAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY — C.A. No. 2500/2001
Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010083862000
Filing Date
12-May-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 2500/2001
Diary Number
8386/2000
Order Date
08-Jan-2010
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. MILIND KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. NAV BHARAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Adv. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jan-2010
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2005
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2500/2001
Summary of State of Rajasthan v. M/s. Nav Bharat Construction Company (C.A. No. 2500/2001) The Supreme Court upheld an arbitral award in a construction contract dispute for Bhimsagar Dam, where the contractor failed to complete work on time. The Court confirmed the Umpire's rejection of most claims (including two specifically identified claims that had been elaborately considered and rejected in a prior judgment), finding no grounds to set aside the award under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, as the Court's review jurisdiction is non-appellate and cannot re-examine the arbitrator's factual conclusions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts