RAVINDER KAUR vs JASDEEP SINGH GILL . — SLP(C) No. 14224 - 14225/2012

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010080942012

Filing Date

12-Mar-2012

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 14224 - 14225/2012

Diary Number

8094/2012

Order Date

27-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER KAUR

    Adv. PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASDEEP SINGH GILL .

    Adv. SAMIR ALI KHAN C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [Caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 23-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 27-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 14-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 12-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 14224 - 14225/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 14224-14225/2012 The Supreme Court disposed of these special leave petitions on September 27, 2013, following a settlement agreement between petitioner Ravinder Kaur and respondents Jasdeep Singh Gill and others. The parties agreed to divide the disputed property with Respondents No. 1-2 receiving the ground floor and annexe, petitioner receiving the first floor, and Respondent No. 3 receiving the second floor (to be constructed) and annexe floors. The petitioner was obligated to vacate the ground floor within one month and compensate Respondent No. 1 at market rent (₹85,000/month for ground floor, ₹30,000/month for annexe) if possession was not delivered timely. All parties agreed to abide by the settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case