C. MANOHARAN vs S. VIJAYALAKSHMI . — C.A. No. 1790/2014

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010077592012

Filing Date

02-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 1790/2014

Diary Number

7759/2012

Order Date

31-Jan-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C. MANOHARAN

    Adv. VIJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. VIJAYALAKSHMI .

    Adv. B. BALAJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [Caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 20-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 02-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 02-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1790/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 1790/2014 - Manoharan v. Vijayalakshmi On January 31, 2014, the Supreme Court allowed C. Manoharan's appeals against the High Court of Madras's November 25, 2011 judgment that had quashed the appointment of State Information Commissioners as arbitrary. The Court found the High Court failed to address the critical question regarding consultation with the Leader of Opposition under Section 15(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and the effect of the Opposition Leader's refusal to attend the selection meeting. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted the case back to the High Court of Madras for fresh decision on merit, directing expeditious resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case