NATIONAL COOP.DEVL.CORP.THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR vs ASST.COMMR.OF I.T — C.A. No. 4618/2014
Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010071952012
Filing Date
28-Feb-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 4618/2014
Diary Number
7195/2012
Order Date
10-Dec-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL COOP.DEVL.CORP.THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) CHRISTI JAIN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASST.COMMR.OF I.T
Adv. MADHULIKA UPADHYAY[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Dec-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
24-Jul-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
23-Jul-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
11-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4618/2014
-
[ 2025 INSC 1414 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 4612/2014
Summary of C.A. No. 004618/2014 (2025 INSC 1414) The Supreme Court dismissed NCDC's appeals challenging disallowance of Section 36(1)(viii) deductions for three income types: dividend income from preference shares, interest on short-term bank deposits, and service charges for Sugar Development Fund loans. The Court held these receipts do not qualify as "profits derived from the business of providing long-term finance" as strictly defined by the 1995 Finance Act amendment, which narrowed the deduction scope to exclude ancillary and indirect income sources unrelated to core long-term lending activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts