HARYANA STATE COOP. LAND DEV. BANK vs NEELAM — C.A. No. 1672/2002

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010071942000

Filing Date

26-Apr-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 1672/2002

Diary Number

7194/2000

Order Date

28-Feb-2005

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA STATE COOP. LAND DEV. BANK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEELAM

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Feb-2005

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 24-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1672/2002

  12. 01-Jan-1970

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's decision, holding that the Labour Court did not err in denying relief to Neelam. The Court ruled that while no prescribed limitation period exists for industrial disputes, courts retain discretion to deny relief for stale claims based on facts and circumstances, particularly where the worker accepted alternative employment, delayed raising the dispute beyond a reasonable time, and third-party rights had been created. The Court also rejected the res judicata objection to the Labour Court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case