COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BANGALORE vs SRIKUMAR AGENCIES ETC. ETC. — C.A. No. 4872 - 4892/2000

Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010067042000

Filing Date

18-Apr-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 4872 - 4892/2000

Diary Number

6704/2000

Order Date

27-Nov-2008

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section Z_NOT KNOWN

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BANGALORE

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRIKUMAR AGENCIES ETC. ETC.

    Adv. M. P. DEVANATH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Nov-2008

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 29-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 14-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 20-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 05-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 09-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 16-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 14-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 25-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 16-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 08-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 18-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4872 - 4892/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court set aside CEGAT's batch of appeals dismissing central excise demands against five companies (including Srikumar Agencies) involved in printed goods like labels, wrappers, and gay matter. The Court found CEGAT improperly disposed of contextually different cases through bare references to precedents without analyzing individual factual circumstances or the applicability of ITC Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Madras. The matter was remitted to CESTAT for individual reconsideration of each case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case