BASAPPA . vs GOWRAMMA — C.A. No. 4730/2007
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010061072005
Filing Date
16-Mar-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 4730/2007
Diary Number
6107/2005
Order Date
01-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASAPPA .
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOWRAMMA
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4730/2007
Case Summary: Basappa v. Gowramma (C.A. No. 004730/2007) On 01/09/2011, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Basappa and another against Gowramma. The appellants had sued for specific performance of a re-conveyance agreement after borrowing Rs. 1500 for their sister's marriage and executing a sale deed in 1976, with a separate agreement to reconvey the property within six years upon repayment. Though appellants paid the amount within six years, the respondent refused reconveyance. The Trial Court decreed the suit, but the lower appellate court and High Court dismissed it, finding the sale deed was not a conditional mortgage. The Supreme Court reversed both lower courts, holding that the valid separate re-conveyance agreement executed on the same date as the sale deed was enforceable, and restored the Trial Court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts