BASAPPA . vs GOWRAMMA — C.A. No. 4730/2007

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010061072005

Filing Date

16-Mar-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 4730/2007

Diary Number

6107/2005

Order Date

01-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASAPPA .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOWRAMMA

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 28-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Mar-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4730/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Basappa v. Gowramma (C.A. No. 004730/2007) On 01/09/2011, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Basappa and another against Gowramma. The appellants had sued for specific performance of a re-conveyance agreement after borrowing Rs. 1500 for their sister's marriage and executing a sale deed in 1976, with a separate agreement to reconvey the property within six years upon repayment. Though appellants paid the amount within six years, the respondent refused reconveyance. The Trial Court decreed the suit, but the lower appellate court and High Court dismissed it, finding the sale deed was not a conditional mortgage. The Supreme Court reversed both lower courts, holding that the valid separate re-conveyance agreement executed on the same date as the sale deed was enforceable, and restored the Trial Court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case