RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PARASAR.NIGAM LTD vs BEERBAL DAS SWAMI — C.A. No. 3835/2003
Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010055892003
Filing Date
10-Mar-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 3835/2003
Diary Number
5589/2003
Order Date
12-Oct-2006
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PARASAR.NIGAM LTD
Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.BEERBAL DAS SWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Oct-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3835/2003
Case Summary: RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PARASAR NIGAM LTD v. BEERBAL DAS SWAMI Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's orders and allowed both appeals. The respondents' writ petitions were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs. Key Issue: Whether work-charge service periods (1960-1963 and 1957-1963) should be counted for pension calculations after the employees were later confirmed and retired. Decision Basis: The Court upheld the Employees Pension Regulations, 1988, Clause 3(i), which explicitly excludes work-charge employees from the definition of "employee" for pensionary benefits. The Court rejected a 1997 circular granting such benefits as it lacked statutory basis and had no retrospective application after the respondents' retirements in 1994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts