RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PARASAR.NIGAM LTD vs BEERBAL DAS SWAMI — C.A. No. 3835/2003

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010055892003

Filing Date

10-Mar-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 3835/2003

Diary Number

5589/2003

Order Date

12-Oct-2006

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PARASAR.NIGAM LTD

    Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BEERBAL DAS SWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 10-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 29-Aug-2003
  12. 28-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Mar-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3835/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PARASAR NIGAM LTD v. BEERBAL DAS SWAMI Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's orders and allowed both appeals. The respondents' writ petitions were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs. Key Issue: Whether work-charge service periods (1960-1963 and 1957-1963) should be counted for pension calculations after the employees were later confirmed and retired. Decision Basis: The Court upheld the Employees Pension Regulations, 1988, Clause 3(i), which explicitly excludes work-charge employees from the definition of "employee" for pensionary benefits. The Court rejected a 1997 circular granting such benefits as it lacked statutory basis and had no retrospective application after the respondents' retirements in 1994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case