HARIDAS DAS vs USHA RANI BANIK . — C.A. No. 7948/2004
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010053722004
Filing Date
09-Mar-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 7948/2004
Diary Number
5372/2004
Order Date
12-Nov-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARIDAS DAS
Adv. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI
Respondent(s)
-
1.USHA RANI BANIK .
Adv. P. K. CHAKRAVARTY RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2007
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Mar-2006
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Mar-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7948/2004
Case Summary: Haridas Das v. Usha Rani Banik On November 12, 2010, the Supreme Court (Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu) dismissed I.A. No. 12 in Civil Appeal No. 7948 of 2004. Applicant Apu Banik, Power of Attorney Holder of deceased respondent Usha Rani Banik, had appealed against a Registrar's order dated March 1, 2008. The Court found no merit in the appeal and no fault with the Registrar's order. Additionally, the Court granted appellant's counsel's oral prayer to delete certain averments from paragraph 13 of the appeal and expunge the mentioned counsel's name. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts