MEGUIN GMBH & CO. vs NANDAN PETROCHEM LTD. — ARBIT.PETITON No. 9/2006
Case under Section PIL-W. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010048352006
Filing Date
20-Feb-2006
Registration No
ARBIT.PETITON No. 9/2006
Diary Number
4835/2006
Order Date
05-Sep-2006
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Data as of 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEGUIN GMBH & CO.
Adv. A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
NANDAN PETROCHEM LTD.
Adv. VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Orders
Case Summary: Arbitration Petition No. 9 of 2006 The Supreme Court allowed Meguin GmbH & Co.'s petition to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the Bombay High Court lacked jurisdiction over the arbitrator appointment matter. Although respondent Nandan Petrochem alleged fraud in its counter-affidavit, the court ruled such questions could be determined by the arbitrator itself and did not bar appointment. Justice S.N. Variava (retired Supreme Court judge) was appointed as arbitrator to resolve disputes between the parties, with arbitration proceedings to be held in Bombay and completed within four months, with fees to be fixed by the arbitrator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts