DISTRICT COLLECTOR, HYDERABAD . vs MARUTHINAGAR COLONY WELFARE ASSN. . — SLP(C) No. 5274/2006

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010045472006

Filing Date

17-Feb-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5274/2006

Diary Number

4547/2006

Order Date

02-Apr-2009

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT COLLECTOR, HYDERABAD .

    Adv. T. V. GEORGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MARUTHINAGAR COLONY WELFARE ASSN. .

    Adv. ANJANI AIYAGARI JOHN MATHEW N. RAJARAMAN G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 21-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 17-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 17-Feb-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5274/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: District Collector, Hyderabad v. Maruthinagar Colony Welfare Association Case: SLP(C) No. 5274/2006 | Decided: 2 April 2009 The Supreme Court disposed of the State's special leave petition challenging a High Court Division Bench order that had set aside summary eviction proceedings against alleged encroachers on survey plots 123-126 in Lallaguda village, Hyderabad. The Court clarified that while the State cannot use summary procedures for eviction, it remains free to pursue action under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, civil suits, or other applicable statutes—provided proper adjudication of occupants' title claims occurs and affected persons receive due process. The Court maintained a one-year status quo on possession to allow the State to secure interim relief from competent authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case