SADASHIV RAMRAO HADBE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — Crl.A. No. 544/2005
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010042382005
Filing Date
22-Feb-2005
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 544/2005
Diary Number
4238/2005
Order Date
17-Jan-2006
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SADASHIV RAMRAO HADBE
Adv. ANIL KUMAR TANDALE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Adv. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 544/2005
Summary: Crl.A. No. 544/2005 - Sadashiv Ramrao Hadbe v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and 10-year sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Court and affirmed by the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Division). The appellant, a medical practitioner charged with rape, was directed to be released from jail immediately. Key Reasoning: The Court found serious doubts in the prosecution's case. Medical evidence contradicted the alleged sexual assault: vaginal swabs showed no spermatozoa despite collection on the same day, and the appellant's medical examination showed presence of smegma indicating no recent sexual intercourse. The Court also noted the prosecution's version was highly improbable—multiple patients were present nearby, the prosecutrix showed no injuries, and her FI statement lacked details she later "improved" in court testimony. The semen stains on clothing were insufficient to prove intercourse. Direction: The appellant was to be released forthwith unless required in another case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts