PIPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEV. AUTHOIRTY vs DIWAKAR GOPAL KHARE . — C.A. No. 1316/2003
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010042302001
Filing Date
03-Mar-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 1316/2003
Diary Number
4230/2001
Order Date
07-Feb-2003
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PIPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEV. AUTHOIRTY
Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIWAKAR GOPAL KHARE .
Adv. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR V. N. RAGHUPATHY J S WAD AND CO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1316/2003
Case Summary: PIPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEV. AUTHORITY v. DIWAKAR GOPAL KHARE Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's revision petition and held that the acquiring authority has the right to file an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act. The Court condoned the 87-day delay and remitted the case back to the Appellate Court for disposition on merits. Background: Respondents sued to challenge land acquisition, the suit was decreed setting aside the acquisition award, and the State's appeal was dismissed by default. The appellant (acquiring authority) filed a late appeal which was dismissed as unmaintainable, leading to the revision petition. Key Holding: Despite Section 50 limiting the acquiring body's participation, Section 54 does not explicitly bar appeals by interested parties. The Court found the acquiring authority is interested and affected when the award is set aside, entitling them to appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts