PIPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEV. AUTHOIRTY vs DIWAKAR GOPAL KHARE . — C.A. No. 1316/2003

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010042302001

Filing Date

03-Mar-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 1316/2003

Diary Number

4230/2001

Order Date

07-Feb-2003

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PIPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEV. AUTHOIRTY

    Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIWAKAR GOPAL KHARE .

    Adv. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR V. N. RAGHUPATHY J S WAD AND CO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Oct-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 25-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Apr-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Mar-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1316/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PIPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEV. AUTHORITY v. DIWAKAR GOPAL KHARE Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's revision petition and held that the acquiring authority has the right to file an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act. The Court condoned the 87-day delay and remitted the case back to the Appellate Court for disposition on merits. Background: Respondents sued to challenge land acquisition, the suit was decreed setting aside the acquisition award, and the State's appeal was dismissed by default. The appellant (acquiring authority) filed a late appeal which was dismissed as unmaintainable, leading to the revision petition. Key Holding: Despite Section 50 limiting the acquiring body's participation, Section 54 does not explicitly bar appeals by interested parties. The Court found the acquiring authority is interested and affected when the award is set aside, entitling them to appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case