STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . vs VITHAL DAMODHAR BANSODE — C.A. No. 11166 - 11167/2013

Case under Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate Appointment, Temporary Appointment, Recruitment,probation and Confirmation, Suspension, Reduction in Rank, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Employees Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010039212013

Filing Date

04-Feb-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 11166 - 11167/2013

Diary Number

3921/2013

Order Date

06-Feb-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate appointment, temporary appointment, recruitment,probation and confirmation, suspension, reduction in rank, termination, dismissal, removal, retirement, disciplinary proceedings against employees Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

    Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VITHAL DAMODHAR BANSODE

    Adv. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Feb-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Feb-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  4. 11-Apr-2017
  5. 11-Apr-2017
  6. 23-Feb-2017
  7. 23-Feb-2017
  8. 11-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Nov-2015
  11. 20-Nov-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  12. 20-Nov-2015
  13. 17-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Dec-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 11166 - 11167/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 011166-011167/2013 The Supreme Court disposed of Maharashtra's civil appeals as infructuous on February 6, 2025, finding the matter had lost efficacy since respondent Vithal Damodhar Bansode attained superannuation in 2022 and the High Court's order had been implemented. The Court directed settlement of the respondent's retiral benefits as per the High Court's directions and clarified it expressed no opinion on the merits. A related SLP(C) No. 80/2016 was also disposed of separately regarding recruitment eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case