DEBASHISH SOREN vs STATE OF JHARKHAND . — SLP(C) No. 8893/2008
Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010036292008
Filing Date
06-Feb-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 8893/2008
Diary Number
3629/2008
Order Date
11-Apr-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEBASHISH SOREN
Adv. R. C. KOHLI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND .
Adv. ANIL K. JHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
10-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
24-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
11-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
22-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8893/2008
Summary of SLP(C) No. 8893/2008 (DEBASHISH SOREN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND) On 11 April 2013, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 8893/2008 along with related petitions. All parties agreed that the enactment of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 had rendered the controversy in these special leave petitions moot. The Court dismissed SLP(C) No. 8893/2008 and related petitions as infructuous, while preserving the right of any party to challenge the constitutional validity of the 2011 Act. A separate writ petition (WP 215/2012) had arguments concluded with judgment reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts