A. CHINNA KESAVA RAO vs ASHOK GALADA . — Crl.A. No. 1468 - 1470/2009

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010035772005

Filing Date

14-Feb-2005

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1468 - 1470/2009

Diary Number

3577/2005

Order Date

05-May-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. CHINNA KESAVA RAO

    Adv. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK GALADA .

    Adv. D. BHARATHI REDDY S. THANANJAYAN PROMILA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 14-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 17-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 25-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 04-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 14-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1468 - 1470/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Supreme Court allowed A. Chinna Kesava Rao's appeals against the High Court's October 2004 order that had quashed criminal proceedings against respondents in a case involving allegations of embezzlement and forgery in a hire purchase finance partnership. The Court set aside the High Court's decision and remanded the three criminal cases to the trial court, ruling that the High Court had prematurely considered unproven documents at the Section 482 CrPC stage. The trial court was directed to independently examine the prima facie case and frame charges based on materials presented, disregarding observations made by higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case