VINOD vs STATE OF M.P . — Crl.A. No. 110/2010

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010033592007

Filing Date

01-Feb-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 110/2010

Diary Number

3359/2007

Order Date

06-Feb-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD

    Adv. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P .

    Adv. MISHRA SAURABH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Dec-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Aug-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 17-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 12-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 22-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 01-Feb-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 110/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vinod v. State of M.P. (Crl.A. No. 110/2010) The Supreme Court partly allowed Vinod's appeal on February 6, 2014. The Court set aside his conviction under Section 302/149 IPC (murder with common object), finding insufficient evidence that he shared a common object in causing the death of Raja Bhoj—the victim's dying declaration attributed no role to him in the murder. However, the Court upheld his convictions under Sections 148, 307/149 IPC, and Section 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act, supported by consistent evidence of his participation in assaulting witness PW-1 and recovery of a knife. All sentences were directed to run concurrently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case