HARI RAM . vs STATE OF HARYANA . — C.A. No. 5440/2000
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010033101999
Filing Date
23-Feb-1999
Registration No
C.A. No. 5440/2000
Diary Number
3310/1999
Order Date
11-Feb-2010
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARI RAM .
Adv. HARINDER MOHAN SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Feb-2010
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-1999
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5440/2000
Summary: Hari Ram v. State of Haryana, C.A. No. 005440/2000 The Supreme Court allowed eight grouped appeals, holding that Haryana's rejection of land release requests violated Article 14 (equality). HUDA acquired 184.56 acres at Narnaul; the State later released over 40 landowners' plots from acquisition but rejected appellants' identical requests using an October 2007 policy applied to no other landowner. The Court found discriminatory treatment: similarly situated owners under the same acquisition proceedings received different decisions without rational basis, violating equal protection principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts