H.U.D.A. . vs SUSHIL DHIR . — SLP(C) No. 3203/2007

Case under Section IV-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010028382007

Filing Date

25-Jan-2007

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 3203/2007

Diary Number

2838/2007

Order Date

28-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.U.D.A. .

    Adv. AJAY PAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL DHIR .

    Adv. VIBHA ARORA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 02-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 21-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 29-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Aug-2008
  18. 13-May-2008
  19. 31-Mar-2008
  20. 25-Feb-2008
  21. 15-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 13-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 17-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 17-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 01-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 12-Feb-2007
  28. 25-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 3203/2007

  29. 15-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 22-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 3203/2007 On 28 March 2014, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Raj Kumar Dua and H.U.D.A. against Sushil Dhir. The Court noted that the High Court had previously directed H.U.D.A. to provide Raj Kumar Dua with an alternative plot in the same sector. H.U.D.A.'s counsel committed to providing this alternative plot within two months, and the Court accepted this undertaking before dismissing the petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case