STATE OF HARYANA . vs RAJ KUMAR SHARMA . — C.A. No. 5442 - 5459/2009

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010028182005

Filing Date

04-Feb-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 5442 - 5459/2009

Diary Number

2818/2005

Order Date

29-Oct-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA .

    Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR SHARMA .

    Adv. A. P. MOHANTY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) R. C. KAUSHIK DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Sep-2013
  5. 09-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 30-Jul-2013
  7. 17-Jan-2013
  8. 08-Oct-2012
  9. 20-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Jan-2010
  12. 07-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Jul-2009
  14. 24-Jul-2009
  15. 09-Jul-2009
  16. 13-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 16-Jan-2009
  21. 22-Aug-2008
  22. 09-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 21-Feb-2008
  25. 13-Dec-2007
  26. 04-Dec-2007
  27. 24-Sep-2007
  28. 19-Sep-2007
  29. 03-Aug-2007
  30. 01-Dec-2006
  31. 15-Sep-2006
  32. 28-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 14-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 07-Jul-2006
  35. 17-Apr-2006
  36. 24-Feb-2006
  37. 10-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 13-Jan-2006
  39. 08-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 21-Jul-2005
  41. 21-Jul-2005
  42. 19-Jul-2005
  43. 04-Apr-2005
  44. 04-Apr-2005
  45. 07-Mar-2005
  46. 04-Mar-2005
  47. 14-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 04-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5442 - 5459/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 005442-005459/2009 The Supreme Court held that work-charge service cannot be counted as regular service for purposes of the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998. The Court reversed High Court orders granting work-charge employees benefits under these rules, finding that "regular satisfactory service" explicitly requires recruitment through prescribed procedures, distinguishing it fundamentally from temporary work-charge employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case