LALLAN SINGH . vs STATE OF U.P. — Crl.A. No. 14 - 16/2009

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010022682006

Filing Date

23-Jan-2006

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 14 - 16/2009

Diary Number

2268/2006

Order Date

23-Jul-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALLAN SINGH .

    Adv. ABHISHEK ATREY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

    Adv. M. R. SHAMSHAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Jan-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 19-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 10-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 18-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 18-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 16-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 01-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 10-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 23-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 14 - 16/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 14-16/2009 (Lallan Singh v. State of U.P.) The Supreme Court upheld the life imprisonment convictions of Lallan Singh and two others for murder (IPC §302, 147, 148, 149), while dismissing their appeals. However, the Court found that two absconding convicts (particularly Sawaroo) remained at large for over six years despite dismissal of their special leave petitions, indicating systemic failures in warrant execution. The Court directed all States/Union Territories to constitute State-level Supervisory Committees comprising the Home Secretary, Law Secretary, Police DG, and Legal Services Authority Secretary to monitor and review such cases biannually and ensure accountability for apprehending finalized convicts who evade arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case