BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. . vs ABDUR RAHMAN . — C.A. No. 7948/2013
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010019762007
Filing Date
16-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 7948/2013
Diary Number
1976/2007
Order Date
10-Sep-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. .
Adv. PAVAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABDUR RAHMAN .
Adv. ABHISTH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
01-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
06-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2009
ROPView PDF
-
31-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
06-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
23-Oct-2008
ROPView PDF
-
18-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
05-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
20-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
03-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
11-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2007
ROPView PDF
-
26-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
05-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
05-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
07-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7948/2013
Case Summary: C.A. No. 7948/2013 (BSNL v. Abdur Rahman) Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed BSNL's appeals without costs. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash BSNL's cancellation orders of employee promotions to Grade IV under the Biennial Cadre Review Scheme. Key Facts: Respondent employees were promoted to Grade IV in 1998-99 but BSNL cancelled these promotions after they had served ~one year, claiming they were made contrary to promotion criteria. The High Court found the cancellations unjustified and inequitable, noting most respondents had already retired or passed away before cancellation orders. Reasoning: The Court held that employees who worked in the higher grade without being responsible for the promotion irregularity could not be reverted without lawful justification, especially when BSNL itself had created supernumerary posts to accommodate them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts