VINDHYACHAL DUBEY (DEAD)BY LRS. . vs RAJ KISHORE TEWARI(DEAD)BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 6957/2003
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010013702001
Filing Date
17-Jan-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 6957/2003
Diary Number
1370/2001
Order Date
08-Jan-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINDHYACHAL DUBEY (DEAD)BY LRS. .
Adv. GAURAV AGRAWAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJ KISHORE TEWARI(DEAD)BY LRS. .
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6957/2003
Case Summary: C.A. No. 006957/2003 The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging the High Court's rejection of their restoration application. The original trial court had decreed a redemption and partition suit in 1978. When the appellants appealed, several respondents died, and the appellants' substitution application to bring legal heirs on record was dismissed for non-appearance in 1991, causing the appeal to abate. The appellants subsequently withdrew a Letters Patent Appeal and filed a restoration application, which the High Court dismissed as unmaintainable. The Supreme Court upheld this dismissal, holding that the proper remedy should have been to pray for setting aside the abatement and substitution of legal heirs, not restoration. Outcome: Appeal dismissed without costs on January 8, 2014. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts