M/S AMRIT FOODS vs COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, U.P. — C.A. No. 1329/2003

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010442003

Filing Date

14-Jan-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 1329/2003

Diary Number

1044/2003

Order Date

26-Oct-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S AMRIT FOODS

    Adv. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, U.P.

    Adv. P. PARMESWARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-May-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1329/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M/S Amrit Foods v. Commissioner of Central Excise, U.P. Outcome: CA No. 1329/2003 was disposed of and remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision on merits; CA No. 7275/2003 was dismissed. Both orders included no order as to costs. Key Issue: Whether Amrit Foods' products (Milk Shake Mix, Soft Serve Mix, Coffee Creamer, Cream Packed) should be classified under Tariff Heading 04.04 (0% duty) or 1901.19 (16% duty), with the core dispute being whether the addition of minimal stabilizing agents removed these essentially dairy products from the 04.04 category. Direction: The Tribunal was directed to dispose of the classification matter on merits within three months, as it had improperly dismissed the appeal without addressing the appellant's substantive arguments. The penalty imposed under Rule 173-Q was upheld as correctly set aside by the Tribunal due to lack of specific notice regarding which clause was allegedly contravened. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case