RAJAMANI NADAR(D) BY LRS. . vs SUBBULAKSHMI NADAR . — SLP(C) No. 2310 - 2311/2003
Case under Section XII. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010010292003
Filing Date
14-Jan-2003
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 2310 - 2311/2003
Diary Number
1029/2003
Order Date
09-Apr-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJAMANI NADAR(D) BY LRS. .
Adv. S. THANANJAYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBBULAKSHMI NADAR .
Adv. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2003
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 2310 - 2311/2003
-
17-Dec-0004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 002310-002311/2003 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioners' Special Leave Petitions challenging the High Court's judgment upholding respondent Subbulakshmi Nadar's title to suit properties. The Court found that the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts—that the properties were not Government Paramboke land—were factually sound and required no interference. Since the petitioners claimed no independent title but merely sought to remain as government tenants, and the Government had accepted the decree against it, the Court upheld the complete chain of judgments favoring the respondent's ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts