RAJAMANI NADAR(D) BY LRS. . vs SUBBULAKSHMI NADAR . — SLP(C) No. 2310 - 2311/2003

Case under Section XII. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010292003

Filing Date

14-Jan-2003

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 2310 - 2311/2003

Diary Number

1029/2003

Order Date

09-Apr-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJAMANI NADAR(D) BY LRS. .

    Adv. S. THANANJAYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBBULAKSHMI NADAR .

    Adv. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 30-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 19-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 17-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 10-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 10-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 25-Nov-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 03-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 19-Nov-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 30-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 28-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 17-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 14-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 2310 - 2311/2003

  27. 17-Dec-0004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 002310-002311/2003 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioners' Special Leave Petitions challenging the High Court's judgment upholding respondent Subbulakshmi Nadar's title to suit properties. The Court found that the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts—that the properties were not Government Paramboke land—were factually sound and required no interference. Since the petitioners claimed no independent title but merely sought to remain as government tenants, and the Government had accepted the decree against it, the Court upheld the complete chain of judgments favoring the respondent's ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case