SUNHERI . vs STATE OF HARYANA — C.A. No. 10176/2016

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010072016

Filing Date

07-Jan-2016

Registration No

C.A. No. 10176/2016

Diary Number

1007/2016

Order Date

17-Oct-2016

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2016 INSC 963

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNHERI .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Oct-2016

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 03-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 03-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 16-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 16-Aug-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 04-Jul-2016
  15. 04-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  16. 04-Jul-2016
  17. 09-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 09-May-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 09-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 18-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 18-Mar-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 18-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 08-Feb-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 08-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 07-Jan-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10176/2016

  27. [ 2016 INSC 964 ]

    JudgementView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the SLP on the condition that petitioners (Sunheri & Ors.) will not be entitled to any statutory benefits for the delayed period if enhancement is granted. The Court issued notice to respondents (State of Haryana), returnable within four weeks. Petitioners were permitted to serve notice on the State's Standing Counsel, with Dasti service also allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case