AMAR SINGH . vs UNION OF INDIA . — W.P.(Crl.) No. 18/2011

Case under Section X. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010002011

Filing Date

07-Jan-2011

Registration No

W.P.(Crl.) No. 18/2011

Diary Number

1000/2011

Order Date

20-Jan-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section X

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAR SINGH .

    Adv. DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. ABHISTH KUMAR E. C. AGRAWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Sep-2013
  11. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Apr-2013
  14. 08-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Sep-2012
  17. 27-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 30-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 31-Oct-2011
  21. 21-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 17-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 07-Jul-2011
  24. 04-Apr-2011
  25. 18-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 07-Jan-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(Crl.) No. 18/2011

  27. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 19-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of W.P.(Crl.) No. 18/2011 (Amar Singh case) On 20 January 2015, the Supreme Court dismissed W.P.(Crl.) No. 18/2011 and ten related petitions as infructuous. The Court noted that the land subject to acquisition had been abandoned by the parties who initiated it, and no active proposal for acquisition remained. The petitions became moot following the Court's earlier judgment in C.A. Nos. 8791-8818 of 2014, which had already addressed the same land acquisition matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case