NITASHA NARAD (MAANYA SADHWANI) vs SANGEETA RAMCHAND SADHWANI — Crl.A. No. 329/2026

Case under Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention : Slps Arising Out of Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention Matters Before the High Court Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010007652026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 329/2026

Diary Number

765/2026

Order Date

13-Jan-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention : SLPs arising out of Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention matters before the High Court Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITASHA NARAD (MAANYA SADHWANI)

    Adv. ABHAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGEETA RAMCHAND SADHWANI

    Adv. NEELAM SINGH [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jan-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jan-2026

    Fresh(Special)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 329/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 329/2026 Nitasha Narad v. Sangeeta Ramchand Sadhwani The Supreme Court granted leave and modified a High Court visitation order concerning a minor child. The appellant had challenged paragraph 5 of the impugned order, which required her to travel from Delhi to Mumbai for in-person visitations. The Court substituted this requirement with video conferencing for the specified visitation days, accepting the respondent's reasonable compromise. Additionally, the Court mandated in-person visitation during summer and winter vacations (minimum two days) after mutual consultation, and deleted paragraph 6 of the original order. The appeal was disposed of accordingly on January 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case