ST. JOSEPH'S CLARA CONVENT . vs STATE OF KERALA . — C.A. No. 8727/2003
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010004682003
Filing Date
06-Jan-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 8727/2003
Diary Number
468/2003
Order Date
24-Jan-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ST. JOSEPH'S CLARA CONVENT .
Adv. P. I. JOSE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KERALA .
Adv. P. V. DINESH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8727/2003
Summary: St. Joseph's Clara Convent v. State of Kerala, C.A. No. 8727/2003 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on January 24, 2013, upholding the High Court and Forest Tribunal's decisions. The Court found that St. Joseph's Clara Convent failed to prove either actual cultivation or intended cultivation of approximately 60 acres of land prior to May 10, 1971 (the vesting date under the Kerala Private Forest Act, 1971), and thus the land validly vested in the State. Key Finding: Although the Convent pleaded that coffee, cardamom, and fruit-bearing trees were planted on the property, it produced no independent witnesses, did not appoint a Commissioner, and examined no neighbors or workers to substantiate its claims. The Court held that insufficient factual foundation prevented the applicability of exemption provisions under Section 3(3) of the 1971 Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts