RAM KISHAN vs SUB DIV.OFFICER (C),HISSAR . — SLP(C) No. 5549/2009

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010001272009

Filing Date

03-Jan-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5549/2009

Diary Number

127/2009

Order Date

05-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM KISHAN

    Adv. K. K. MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUB DIV.OFFICER (C),HISSAR .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 13-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 20-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Jan-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5549/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Ram Kishan challenged a High Court order dismissing his writ petition against a ₹3,50,000 penalty imposed under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act. The Supreme Court allowed the petition, finding the penalty excessive and harsh given that a civil court had declared Ram Kishan a Gair Marusi (protected) tenant. The Court reduced the penalty to ₹1 lakh (the amount Ram Kishan had deposited in April 2009) and set aside the orders of the High Court and Collector, Hisar. Respondents were permitted to withdraw the deposited amount upon production of the Court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case