THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ETC. AND ETC. STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) vs R. THIAGARAJAN AND ORS. ETC. — C.A. No. 10030 - 10189/2017

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010106462014

Filing Date

29-Mar-2014

Registration No

C.A. No. 10030 - 10189/2017

Diary Number

10646/2014

Order Date

28-Nov-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ETC. AND ETC. STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R. THIAGARAJAN AND ORS. ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2017

    ROPView PDF

  3. 08-May-2017

    ROPView PDF

  4. 08-May-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  5. 08-May-2017

    ROPView PDF

  6. 03-May-2017

    ROPView PDF

  7. 03-May-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  8. 03-May-2017

    ROPView PDF

  9. 06-Apr-2017

    ROPView PDF

  10. 06-Apr-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  11. 06-Apr-2017

    ROPView PDF

  12. 24-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 03-Oct-2016

    ROPView PDF

  16. 03-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Oct-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  18. 03-Oct-2016

    ROPView PDF

  19. 03-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  21. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  22. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  23. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  24. 05-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  25. 05-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  26. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  27. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  28. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  29. 05-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  30. 17-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  31. 18-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  32. 18-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  33. 09-Dec-2015

    ROPView PDF

  34. 09-Dec-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  35. 09-Dec-2015

    ROPView PDF

  36. 01-Dec-2015

    ROPView PDF

  37. 01-Dec-2015

    ROPView PDF

  38. 01-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 01-May-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 01-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 16-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  42. 16-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  43. 16-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  44. 16-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  45. 13-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 13-Mar-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 13-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 16-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 16-Jan-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 16-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 08-Dec-2014

    ROPView PDF

  52. 08-Dec-2014

    ROPView PDF

  53. 19-Aug-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 19-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 29-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10030 - 10189/2017

  56. [ 2019 INSC 1293 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 10029/2017

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10PDF 11
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case C.A. No. 010030-010189/2017 The Supreme Court of India upheld the High Court's decision to constitute a fresh Pay Grievance Redressal Committee (PGRC) with retired Judge D. Murugesan as chairman to reconsider pay-scale anomalies in Tamil Nadu government posts, rejecting both the government's attempt to reverse prior pay benefits without notice and the employees' plea for complete reversal. The Court ruled that while the government can rectify pay anomalies, it must follow due process with adequate notice and hearing, clarifying that any reduction in pay scales would be prospective only and previously paid amounts would not be recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case