C.A. No. 004395 / 2014
RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT UTP.NIGAM LTD vs SUDIEP SHRIVASTAVA
Status
DISPOSED
Judges
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
Order Date
16-10-2023
Filed On
27-03-2014 12:00 AM
PDF 1
PDF 2
PDF 3
PDF 4
PDF 5
PDF 6
PDF 7
PDF 8
PDF 9
PDF 10
PDF 11
PDF 12
PDF 13
PDF 14
PDF 15
PDF 16
PDF 17
PDF 18
PDF 19
PDF 20
PDF 21
PDF 22
PDF 23
PDF 24
PDF 25
PDF 26
PDF 27
PDF 28
PDF 29
PDF 30
PDF 31
PDF 32
PDF 33
PDF 34
PDF 35
PDF 36
PDF 37
PDF 38
PDF 39
PDF 40
PDF 41
PDF 42
PDF 43
PDF 44
PDF 45
PDF 46
PDF 47
PDF 48
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary
Where an NGT order directing fresh environmental scrutiny under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 results in the competent authority subsequently granting a reasoned approval after completing the mandated process, the original challenge to forest diversion orders becomes infructuous and the appeal does not survive for adjudication. Further, where a writ petition under Article 226 is pending before the High Court, a petitioner must be relegated to pursue interim and substantive reliefs before that forum, with the Supreme Court refraining from expressing any opinion on the merits. This analysis is brought to you by casestatus.in, tracking environmental and forest law jurisprudence in India.