SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL, S/O LATE SRI H.P. AGARWAL vs UNION OF INDIA — WMAP/145/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 09th April 2026.

CNR: RJHC020311642026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

WMAP/18053/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WMAP/145/2026

Registration Date

02-04-2026

Judge

ANUROOP SINGHI

Coram

ANUROOP SINGHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Other Civil ordinary matters which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 4201 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL, S/O LATE SRI H.P. AGARWAL

Adv. ABHINAV SHARMA

SUDHIR KUMAR AGARWAL, S/O LATE SH. H.P. AGARWAL

SMT. PRABHA AGARWAL, W/O SUDHIR KUMAR AGARWAL

SMT. VISHAKHA AGARWAL, W/O SRI SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA

RAJVANSHI AND ASSOCIATES

M/S AIREN METALS PVT. LTD.

Hearing History

Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI

07-04-2026

FOR ORDERS- MISC. CASES

Orders

07-04-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
09-04-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI

Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted the petitioners an extension until April 30, 2026, to file their reply to a bank's Show Cause Notice regarding alleged fraud, as the forensic audit report was served beyond the court-prescribed 15-day period. The court clarified this was the final extension and that the bank could proceed with action if no reply was filed, while directing compliance with Supreme Court guidelines on fraud-related proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted the petitioners an extension until April 30, 2026, to file their reply to a bank's Show Cause Notice regarding alleged fraud, as the forensic audit report was served beyond the court-prescribed 15-day period. The court clarified this was the final extension and that the bank could proceed with action if no reply was filed, while directing compliance with Supreme Court guidelines on fraud-related proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case