SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL, S/O LATE SRI H.P. AGARWAL vs UNION OF INDIA — WMAP/145/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020311642026

Filing Number

WMAP/18053/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WMAP/145/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Other Civil ordinary matters which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 4201 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL, S/O LATE SRI H.P. AGARWAL

    Adv. ABHINAV SHARMA

  2. 2.SUDHIR KUMAR AGARWAL, S/O LATE SH. H.P. AGARWAL

  3. 3.SMT. PRABHA AGARWAL, W/O SUDHIR KUMAR AGARWAL

  4. 4.SMT. VISHAKHA AGARWAL, W/O SRI SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

  2. 2.RAJVANSHI AND ASSOCIATES

  3. 3.M/S AIREN METALS PVT. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted the petitioners an extension until April 30, 2026, to file their reply to a bank's Show Cause Notice regarding alleged fraud, as the forensic audit report was served beyond the court-prescribed 15-day period. The court clarified this was the final extension and that the bank could proceed with action if no reply was filed, while directing compliance with Supreme Court guidelines on fraud-related proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    For Orders- Misc. Cases

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMAP/145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted the petitioners an extension until April 30, 2026, to file their reply to a bank's Show Cause Notice regarding alleged fraud, as the forensic audit report was served beyond the court-prescribed 15-day period. The court clarified this was the final extension and that the bank could proceed with action if no reply was filed, while directing compliance with Supreme Court guidelines on fraud-related proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case