SHARVAN vs PRABHU DAYAL SON OF LATE SHRI HARI SINGH @ HAMEER SINGH, Advocate - KRISHAN CHANDER SHARMA — CSA/134/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
CNR: RJHC020224872026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
CSA/12992/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
CSA/134/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Civil Second Appeals which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 3900 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHARVAN
Adv. SAMPTI SHARMA,AJAY GUPTA,AJAY GUPTA, ,AJAY GUPTA
-
2.HARDAN
-
3.DATA RAM,
-
4.RAMESH
-
5.BANSARSI,
-
6.SANJYA
-
7.VIMLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRABHU DAYAL SON OF LATE SHRI HARI SINGH @ HAMEER SINGH, Advocate - KRISHAN CHANDER SHARMA
-
2.KAILASH CHAND
-
3.KABOOL CHAND
-
4.MATADIN
-
5.KAMLI DEVI WIFE OF HAZARI LAL, D/O HARI SINGH,
-
6.SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF BHOOP SINGH,
-
7.SAROJ WIFE OF ROHITASH, D/O HARI SINGH,
-
8.ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
-
9.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,
Case History
-
30-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-May-2026
Incomplete
-
17-Apr-2026
Ashutosh KumarView PDF
Summary In Civil Second Appeal No. 134/2026 before the Rajasthan High Court, Justice Ashutosh Kumar issued a notice to respondents (returnable within six weeks) regarding appellants' challenge to a lower court's order concerning an electric connection dispute. The court imposed an interim stay directing the electricity board (respondent Nos. 8 and 9) not to shift the electric connection from Khasra No. 23 to Khasra No. 94 pending further hearing, noting the matter requires consideration as Khasra No. 94 belongs to neither party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Ashutosh KumarView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Ashutosh KumarView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CSA/134/2026
Summary In Civil Second Appeal No. 134/2026 before the Rajasthan High Court, Justice Ashutosh Kumar issued a notice to respondents (returnable within six weeks) regarding appellants' challenge to a lower court's order concerning an electric connection dispute. The court imposed an interim stay directing the electricity board (respondent Nos. 8 and 9) not to shift the electric connection from Khasra No. 23 to Khasra No. 94 pending further hearing, noting the matter requires consideration as Khasra No. 94 belongs to neither party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts