VIKAS KUMAR S/O ARJUN SINGH ANKIT KHANDELWAL vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/2680/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020146962026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/6359/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/2680/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)

Coram

Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS KUMAR S/O ARJUN SINGH ANKIT KHANDELWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)View PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to four accused persons (Vikas Kumar, Naseem, Mohammad Dilsad, and Ajruddin) charged with cyber fraud under BNSS and IT Act sections. The court found that despite the prosecution's opposition, the accused had no criminal antecedents, had been in custody since January 2026, a co-accused juvenile was already bailed, and trial would be protracted, warranting their release on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/2680/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to four accused persons (Vikas Kumar, Naseem, Mohammad Dilsad, and Ajruddin) charged with cyber fraud under BNSS and IT Act sections. The court found that despite the prosecution's opposition, the accused had no criminal antecedents, had been in custody since January 2026, a co-accused juvenile was already bailed, and trial would be protracted, warranting their release on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case