BABITA DEVI AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/34569/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011852962025

e-Filing Number

13-11-2025

Filing Number

CWP/72209/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

CWP/34569/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABITA DEVI AND ANR

    Adv. DHEERAJ KUMAR NARULA

  2. 2.Babita Devi and Anr

  3. 3.Vinay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.The Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary

  4. 4.Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

  5. 5.Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa

  6. 6.The Municipal Committee, Sirsa

  7. 7.PWD B and R Haryana through its Secretary, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-34569-2025 Petitioners sought Rs.75 lakh compensation for their son's death in a stray animal accident on 04.12.2024. The court noted Haryana's policy provides financial assistance for such accidental deaths, but applies only from 08.09.2025 (after the incident). Rather than determining compensation itself, the court directed the competent authority to adjudicate the claim under applicable policy within six weeks, with both parties accepting this arrangement. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/34569/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-34569-2025 Petitioners sought Rs.75 lakh compensation for their son's death in a stray animal accident on 04.12.2024. The court noted Haryana's policy provides financial assistance for such accidental deaths, but applies only from 08.09.2025 (after the incident). Rather than determining compensation itself, the court directed the competent authority to adjudicate the claim under applicable policy within six weeks, with both parties accepting this arrangement. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case