BABITA DEVI AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/34569/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC011852962025
Next Hearing
17th December 2025
e-Filing Number
13-11-2025
Filing Number
CWP/72209/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
CWP/34569/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Judge
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Coram
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABITA DEVI AND ANR
Adv. DHEERAJ KUMAR NARULA
Babita Devi and Anr
Vinay Kumar
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
State of Haryana and others
The Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary
Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa
The Municipal Committee, Sirsa
PWD B and R Haryana through its Secretary, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh
Orders
Case Summary: CWP-34569-2025 Petitioners sought Rs.75 lakh compensation for their son's death in a stray animal accident on 04.12.2024. The court noted Haryana's policy provides financial assistance for such accidental deaths, but applies only from 08.09.2025 (after the incident). Rather than determining compensation itself, the court directed the competent authority to adjudicate the claim under applicable policy within six weeks, with both parties accepting this arrangement. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CWP-34569-2025 Petitioners sought Rs.75 lakh compensation for their son's death in a stray animal accident on 04.12.2024. The court noted Haryana's policy provides financial assistance for such accidental deaths, but applies only from 08.09.2025 (after the incident). Rather than determining compensation itself, the court directed the competent authority to adjudicate the claim under applicable policy within six weeks, with both parties accepting this arrangement. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts